Sunday, April 19, 2015

Police Officers - Are They Above the Law

Is it just me or does it seem like just about every day now we hear reports about another police involved shooting across the country that claimed a life, ie, a 23-year-old man was shot and killed by St. Louis County police officers in Jennings, Missouri, after allegedly charging at them with a knife; Prosecutors drop charges against a Kansas City police officer who shot and wounded an unarmed man arguing the case was not strong enough to secure a conviction; a police officer in North Charleston, S.C., was charged with murder after the April 4 shooting of an unarmed  man, Walter L. Scott was caught on video; LAPD officers shot a Skid Row resident on Tuesday afternoon - One more incident of an unprovoked shooting which, thankfully did not result in death; the man who was shot and killed by a police officer early Sunday morning in Jessamine County was 40-year old Michael Foster; A white police officer in an Atlanta suburb shot dead an unarmed black man who was not wearing clothes on Monday; Funeral held for man shot and killed by Smyrna police; An 18-year-old man was fatally shot by police just blocks from his home; Atlanta police are investigating an officer-involved shooting that injured a man on Ralph David Abernathy Boulevard near Garibaldi Street; White deputy sheriff becomes latest American officer charged in the shooting of a black man that was captured on video; Police have released video capturing the accidental fatal shooting of a black man in Tulsa, Oklahoma; Atlanta police officer accused of killing woman he met on Craigslist. Well that last one is not the same as the others, but interesting and worth mentioning just the same.

From what I've read it appears some police officers are not using good judgement when faced with what has now become routine situations. How in the world you can mistake your teaser gun for a hand gun? Shouldn't they be kept on separate parts of your body to avoid mixing them up? I'm no expert, but it seems to me that a teaser and a hand gun would feel different.  Shouldn't you double check to make sure you have the right thing in your hand before you squeeze the trigger? 


And when these officers of the law are not discharging their weapons without cause, they seem to have the same judgment impediment when pursuing suspects, i.e., Man Fatally Shot After Police Chase, Multi-Vehicle Crash in Houston; Fatal U-Haul Police Chase in Southern California; Officer says passenger was holding pop can, not gun during chase and shooting; Police chase leads to fatal wreck in East Point; Police officers fatally shot a man who led them on a chase Wednesday morning in northeast Harris County; Southern Methodist University police chase ends in fatal crash; Suspect charged in fatal police chase accident in Toledo; A police chase in California left at least seven dead – including four small children; Suspects crashed after a police chase in Cobb County on Wednesday; Duluth police chase ends with fatality;  A 17-year-old driver was killed and a passenger was critically injured when a high-speed chase with police involving a stolen vehicle ended; Teen driver in stolen car killed in crash following police chase; 17-year-old dies after trying to jump from roof to roof in Fordham section of Bronx to avoid police.  

I must admit I am shocked at the amount of officer related shootings and fatal crashes across the country this year alone. Sure each case is different and in some cases the victim was guilty of some infraction but did they need to pay with their lives? Whatever happened to “due process”? In all of these cases the officer appointed himself the judge, jury, and executioner. It may not have been their mindset at the time of the incident (or maybe it was), but the end result is the same. Some of these cases have become racially charged as the officer was “white” and the victim was “black”. Some may argue that officers are trained to shoot to kill in the face of imminent threat or danger, however in some of the cases referenced above, it was a clear case of murder because the victim was either running away from the officer or had surrendered thereby posing no imminent threat/danger to the officer or anyone else.


I don’t think for one minute that the number of officer related shootings have increased, but rather it is the number of documented incidents that have increased as a result of social awareness and social network, along with modern technology which puts video capability in the hands of anyone with a cellphone.  Back in the day, black men were prone to be pulled over while driving by an officer who felt he had just cause because the driver was “black” and fit the “profile” of any given offender they were looking for just because he was black, thus the popular saying “guilty of driving while black” was coined.  But back to what I was saying about increase in documented incidents of police shootings. Had it not been for private citizens who captured the events, those officers would lie about the details of the shooting as well as incriminate the victim by planting guns and/or substance on the victim to justify the shooting as was recently the case in North Charleston, SC. Had the video not surfaced, the officer’s account of the incident would have been the beginning of the end and that victim’s death would have been ruled justified.  Thankfully the video reveals that the victim was running way from the officer when he was shot point blank in the back.  Makes you think of how many other victims were killed in a similar manner and their deaths ruled justified.


It seems to me that some of these officers have no right being police officers, let alone carry a gun because they displayed poor judgment. They took an oath to protect and serve but they have failed on so many levels. I remember years ago on the island that potential police candidates were sent for psychiatric evaluation to determine their suitability for the role of a police officer. If it was found that an individual’s psyche was not strong enough to withstand the strain that being a police officer would inflict upon it, meaning they would make poor judgement when faced with a life or death situation, a recommendation was made not to hire that individual.   I’m not sure if that practice holds true on the mainland, but if it is not then I seriously suggest they adopt that practice. Not that this would be a save all to end all, but it would help weed out some of the trigger happy people who can be a victim’s nightmare. If in fact they already do practice this policy of psychiatric screening, then some serious training or re-training in judgement is required. Officers need to be able to defuse a potentially dangerous situation by pulling back in the interest of the public’s safety. They don’t have to always catch their man that day. In most cases they know where the suspect lives or can tap into resources which will eventually lead them to the suspect another time. I am convinced that the reason a lot of these officers pursue their suspects at all cost  is all about their ego and the need to prove to others, and even themselves, that they can take down a suspect even at the expense of innocent bystanders.  Proper training will ensure that if a suspect tries to engage an officer in a high speed chase that the officer would pull back and let the suspect think he got away. A few days of freedom is a small price to pay as opposed to having the suspect killed in a high speed chase which could also claim the life of others.




I don’t know about you but I think it’s time for a change. Officers need to be held accountable for their actions, accidental or not, and not allowed to hide behind their badge. I see them every day breaking the law because they feel they are above the law. I know you've see them too, i.e., turning on their siring to avoid sitting at a red light, going above the required speed limit, turning without utilizing turn signals, etc. It’s hard for me to respect the men in blue when they don’t respect me. How can they expect to enforce the very law that they themselves have little or no regard/respect for? I know disobeying traffic laws is a far cry from taking someone’s life, but to me they are all on the same plain. If you have no regard for the little things, then it’s only a matter of time before you disregard the big things. I’m just saying – I got issues, what about you?)i(


Copyright © Todos Escribe. All Right Reserved
 The views and opinions shared here are by the Author and are the property of Todos Escribe. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday - Not Really Holy

I'm sitting here thinking about Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday and wondering about their true origin. I mean what does bunny rabbits ...